Gerber v. Prunty
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant sought damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident near Elko, Nevada. Jury verdict was in favor of respondent. Appellant contends the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence. We disagree.
The record contains sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict and, thus, it will not be disturbed. Steen v. Gass, 85 Nev. 249, 454 P.2d 94 (1969); Quilici v. Battaglia, 78 Nev. 413, 374 P.2d 887 (1962); Leete v. Southern Pac. Co., 37 Nev. 49, 139 P.29 (1914).
Other issues raised by appellant are without merit.
Affirmed.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Steen v. GassNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Leete v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1914
- Quilici v. BattagliaNevada Supreme Court · 1962
4Cited by2 opinions
- National Convenience Stores, Inc. v. FantauzziNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- National Convenience Stores, Inc. v. FantauzziNevada Supreme Court · 1978