John Coquico v. Loretta E. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether “unlawful laser activity” under state law is a crime involving moral turpitude.
I
On September 1, 2006, John Coquico, a' citizen of the Philippines, was convicted of misdemeanor “unlawful laser activity” in violation of California Penal Code (“CaLPenal Code”) § 417.26, after using a laser device in the hallway of the Alameda County criminal courthouse. A year later, he was also convicted of second degree robbery in violation of CaLPenal Code § 211, and the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) sought his removal under the Immigration…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Marmolejo-Campos v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Jose Roberto Fernandez-Ruiz v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Galeana-Mendoza v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lopez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Felipe Betansos v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Murillo-Chavez v. BondiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- J-G-PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
- Jose Flores-Vasquez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.