Legal Opinion

John Coquico v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 17, 2015No. 09-73867PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether “unlawful laser activity” under state law is a crime involving moral turpitude.

I

On September 1, 2006, John Coquico, a' citizen of the Philippines, was convicted of misdemeanor “unlawful laser activity” in violation of California Penal Code (“CaLPenal Code”) § 417.26, after using a laser device in the hallway of the Alameda County criminal courthouse. A year later, he was also convicted of second degree robbery in violation of CaLPenal Code § 211, and the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) sought his removal under the Immigration…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Marmolejo-Campos v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Jose Roberto Fernandez-Ruiz v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Galeana-Mendoza v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lopez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. Felipe Betansos v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Murillo-Chavez v. BondiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  4. J-G-PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
  5. Jose Flores-Vasquez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API