Legal Opinion

Challiss v. Headley & Carr

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1872PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Atchison District Court. Two actions were brought by L. C. Challiss in the Atchi- ' ,son district court. In No. 152 James A. Headley wad. Joseph , F. Carr were defendants; the petition was filed in December 1861, an order of attachment sued out and served, and service' by publication, the answer-day being June 14, 1862. In the-other suit, No. 271, said Headley and Carr, and Rosaline P. Carr, Lizzie P. Abbott, Thomas Wise, and Wm. Crookham were defendants.

Read the full summary

Error from Atchison District Court. Two actions were brought by L. C. Challiss in the Atchi- ' ,son district court. In No. 152 James A. Headley wad. Joseph , F. Carr were defendants; the petition was filed in December 1861, an order of attachment sued out and served, and service' by publication, the answer-day being June 14, 1862. In the-other suit, No. 271, said Headley and Carr, and Rosaline P. Carr, Lizzie P. Abbott, Thomas Wise, and Wm. Crookham were defendants. This last action was to foreclose a mortgage executed by James A. Headley, Joseph P. Carr and Rosaline P. Carr; the petition was…

1Opinion of the Court

'The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

Some of the questions in this case are identical with those in the case of Foreman v. Scott, just decided, .■and therefore we need not consider them in this. There are also some different questions which will require examination. It is objected as against the decree that it contained a personal judgment for money, and an order for an execution for the amount, if any, unsatisfied by a sale of the mortgaged premises. Conceding this to be unauthorized, it would not affect the validity of the decree for foreclosure and sale, nor authorize a…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CollierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Indiana University Foundation v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  4. Headley v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  5. Pierce v. ButtersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API