Legal Opinion

Bassett v. Swenson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1931No. 5645Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.

McNAUGHTON, J.

—A petition, for rehearing has been filed by the appellants; also a motion by respondent challenging the appellants’ cost bill.

Appellants claim that the decision in this case is inconsistent with the holding of this court in Marshall v. Niagara Springs Orchard Co., 22 Ida. 144, 125 Pac. 208. In the Marshall case the court concluded from the record that a trespass had been committed in procuring data for the application for a permit to appropriate water. The court held that on that account the permit thus initiated was void. In this case the undisputed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portneuf-Marsh Valley Irrigation Co. v. Portneuf Irrigating Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Washington Water Power Co. v. WatersIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Marshall v. Niagara Springs Orchard Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Rawson-Works Lumber Co. v. RichardsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  5. California Gulch Placer Mining Co. v. PatrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API