Legal Opinion
Sherar v. Besse
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 2008No. 2007 CA 2003Published
1Opinion of the Court
JUDITH SENAC SHERAR
v.
JULIE BESSE AND LLOYD BESSE, JR.
No. 2007 CA 2003
Court of Appeals of Louisiana, First Circuit.
July 23, 2008.
JOHN A. KELLER, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee Judith Senac Sherar.
MARION B. FARMER, SUELLEN RICHARDSON, Counsel for Defendant/Appellant Julie Besse.
Before: CARTER, C.J., WHIPPLE, PARRO, GUIDRY, and HUGHES, JJ.
GUIDRY, J.
The defendant/appellant, Julie Besse,[1] appeals a judgment that ordered her to pay to the plaintiff, Judith Senac Sherar, the sum of $48,709.42, together with interest, as repayment of a loan made by the plaintiff's father, Charles Senac (Mr. Senac),…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Landiak v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Jones v. McDonald's CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Taboni ex rel. Taboni v. Estate of LongoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001