Legal Opinion
Vicentin S.A.I.C. v. United StatesPublic version posted 07/09/2020.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 1, 2020No. Consol. 18-00111PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Slip Op. 20-91 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE VICENTIN S.A.I.C. ET AL., Plaintiffs and Consolidated Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge Defendant, Consol. Court No. 18-00111 PUBLIC VERSION and NATIONAL BIODIESEL BOARD FAIR TRADE COALITION, Defendant-Intervenor and Consolidated Defendant- Intervenor. OPINION AND ORDER [Sustaining in part and remanding in part Commerce’s remand redetermination.] Dated: July 1, 2020 Daniel L. Porter, Christopher A. Dunn, and Valerie S. Ellis, Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP, of Washington, DC, for plaintiffs Vicentin…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vicentin S.A.I.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- PT. Zinus Glob. Indonesia v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Vicentin S.A.I.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022