Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Schwieterman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2007No. 2006-2306PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Robert C. Schwieterman of West Chester, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0061353, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1993. On November 8, 2004, we imposed an interim suspension of respondent’s license to practice law under Gov.Bar R. V(5) after we received notice that he had been convicted of a felony. In re Schwieterman, 103 Ohio St.3d 1522, 2004-Ohio-5853, 817 N.E.2d 405.

{¶ 2} On January 30, 2006, relator, Cincinnati Bar Association, filed a second amended complaint charging respondent with several violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Respondent stipulated to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. YajkoOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CrowleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. CrossmockOhio Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Toledo Bar Assn. v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. Crawford, C-070816 (11-7-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. J.M. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API