Legal Opinion
Eubanks v. Gore
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 27, 1972No. 3972PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULPEPPER, Judge.
Plaintiff seeks damages for the deaths of his IS cattle by arsenic poisoning. He named as defendants (1) his neighbor, James Gore, who allegedly sprayed his fence line with a weed killer containing arsenic, (2) the Missouri-Pacific Railroad Company which allegedly gave the weed-killing compound to Gore, their employee, without warning as to its deadly nature, (3) R. H. Bogle Company, which had the contract with the railroad company to spray its right of way with weed killer, and whose employees allegedly gave the poison to Gore without warning as to its dangerous qualities,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Allien v. Louisiana Power & Light CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Helminger v. Cook Paint and Varnish CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- McVay v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of NewarkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- Christy v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Cooksey v. Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- In Re Air Crash Disaster at New Orleans, Etc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1975
- Weems v. MossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975