Conrad v. Kerby

OPINION

By HAMILTON, PJ.

Heard on appeal on questions of law.

The plaintiff’s action was a suit for damages for injuries received in an automobile collision.

The defendant denied negligence and filed a cross-petition for damages against the plaintiff.

The case was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was filed and overruled, and judgment entered on the verdict.

The specifications of error are limited to two propositions of law:

1st. Irregularities in the selection of a jury.

2nd. The inadmissibility of certain evidence offered by the plaintiff,…