Legal Opinion

Steckelberg v. Nebraska State Patrol

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 2016No. S-15-879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 09/23/2016 08:09 AM CDT - 842 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 294 Nebraska R eports STECKELBERG v. NEBRASKA STATE PATROL Cite as

294 Neb. 842

Todd Steckelberg, appellant, v. Nebraska State Patrol, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed September 23, 2016. No. S-15-879. 1. Mandamus: Judgments: Appeal and Error. An action for a writ of mandamus is a law action, and in an appellate review of a bench trial of a law action, a trial court’s finding has the effect of a jury verdict and will not be set aside unless clearly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Harbor Insurance v. Continental Bank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Roskop Dairy v. GEA Farm Tech.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State Ex Rel. Nebraska Health Care Ass'n v. Department of Health & Human Services Finance & SupportNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Evertson v. City of KimballNebraska Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Veskrna v. SteelNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Nyamatore v. SchuermanNebraska Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. TackettNebraska Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API