Legal Opinion

Paliotto v. Dickerson

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAnthony M. Livoti, J.

This is a motion in accordance with section 571 of the Civil Practice Act, requiring the respondent to furnish security to indemnify petitioner against all loss or damages which he has or may sustain by reason of the stay of execution of the order entered on September 25, 1961, granting petitioner’s application under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act.

Heretofore a proceeding was brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act by petitioner to have a purported zoning amendment to the Revised Zoning Ordinances of the Town of Islip adjudged void and of no effect insofar as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Callanan Road Improvement Co. v. Town of NewburghNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. International Railway Co. v. Town of CheektowagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. International Railway Co. v. Town of CheektowagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Demisay, Inc. v. PetitoNew York Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API