Legal Opinion

Bossert v. Douglas

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 9, 1976No. 48722PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROMANG, Judge.

This is a garnishment proceeding after verdict and judgment. Plaintiff obtained a $90,000.00 verdict against the defendants in an action based upon personal injuries sustained by his son in an automobile collision. The judgment rendered on the verdict, reads:

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the court that said Plaintiff have and recover from the Defendants the sum of $90,000.00 together with interest at the rate of 6% from the 20th day of August, 1971, the date suit was commenced to the 13th day of November, 1972, the date of this verdict, and interest at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Factory Mutual Liability Ins. Co. of Amer. v. CooperSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  2. Whitmire v. ZolbeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Worthan v. Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Baughn v. BusickCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. StarkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. MilneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. TraverTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Reagor v. Travelers Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API