Legal Opinion

City of Port Isabel v. FERC

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 6, 2024No. 23-1174PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 17, 2024 Decided August 6, 2024 No. 23-1174 CITY OF PORT ISABEL, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT RIO BRAVO PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC AND RIO GRANDE LNG, LLC, INTERVENORS Consolidated with 23-1221 On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Nathan Matthews argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the joint briefs were Lisa M. Diaz, Tom Gosselin, and Gilberto Hinojosa. Eric E. Huber entered an appearance. Robert M. Kennedy, Senior Attorney,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Port Isabel v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
  2. City of Port Isabel v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
  3. For a Better Bayou v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026
  4. Shanks v. International Union of Bricklayers and Allied CraftworkersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API