Legal Opinion
Lucero v. Aladdin Beauty Colleges, Inc.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1994No. 21268PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
Aladdin Beauty Colleges appeals from an award of attorney’s fees and prejudgment interest made to Cecelia Lucero. Lucero cross-appeals from the refusal of the court to instruct the jury to consider whether she was entitled to pain and suffering damages for Aladdin’s violation of her human rights. We affirm the award of attorney’s fees and prejudgment interest and dismiss the cross-appeal on procedural grounds.
Facts and proceedings. Aladdin employed Lucero as an instructor at its Roswell school. In November 1985, Aladdin terminated Lucero for her failure to enforce the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. FDC Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Economy Rentals, Inc. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- First National Bank v. Energy Equities Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Southard v. FoxNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jones v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Gonzales v. New Mexico Department of HealthNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Kennedy v. Dexter Consolidated SchoolsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Weidler v. Big J Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.