Legal Opinion

United States v. Billy David Dickens

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 10, 1969No. 19522_1PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

The appellant was convicted of knowingly possessing stolen property in violation of Section 659, Title 18, United States Code. He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. His primary con*959tention here is that the trial court erred in restricting the cross-examination of the government’s principal witness and admitted accomplice, Allen Reinhardt, and that such restriction denied the appellant the Sixth Amendment right of an accused to confront the witness against him. The appellant specifies the following restrictions of cross-examination in asserting denial of his…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Phillip Onori and Theodore BukkyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Evans v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. United States v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API