Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Nichols

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1912No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Macomb; Tappan, J., presiding. Bill by George H. Nichols against Elizabeth Nichols for divorce. Defendant filed a cross-bill praying that the court set aside a separation agreement existing between herself and husband. From a decree dismissing bill and cross-bill, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Complainant asked for a decree of divorce. Defendant, in a cross-bill, asked for a disclosure of the property and income of complainant, that a certain agreement entered into by the parties, providing for her support and that of her child, be found to be unconscionable, to have been procured by fraud and duress, and be ordered to be set aside, and that complainant be required to provide for the suitable support and maintenance of the defendant and her child. There was a prayer for other and further relief. The decree dismissed the bill. It also dismissed the cross-bill without prejudice. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Randall v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Bechtel v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Schmoltz v. SchmoltzMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Metcalf v. TiffanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Berner's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. In Re Estate of Henry WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. Emery v. EmeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. In re Jeannot's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Melrose v. BesserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API