Legal Opinion

State v. Scanlan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1874PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Criminal Court. J. C. JYormile, for Respondent, cited Commonwealth vs. Mullins, 2 Allen [Mass.], 296; Commonwealth vs. Hills, 10 Gush., 530; 1 Wkart., § 755, [6th Ed.]; Cook vs. Mix, 11 Conn., 432; Reynolds vs. Lounsbury, 6 Hill, 53; Chouteau vs. Sarpy, 8 Mo., 733; Roscoe’s Crim. Ev. [6th Ed.], 106 ; State vs. LeBlanc, 1 Const., 354 ; State vs. Whittier, 21 Me., 341; Washburn vs. The People, 10 Mich., 372; 2 Wagn. Stat., 1374, § 8.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, Judge

The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree, committed upon his wife, and sentenced to death. His appeal to this court brings us but one question for review. This appears in the following extract from the bill of exceptions:

“The State then offered as á witness in behalf of the prosecution, Mamie Scanlan. Upon being thus presented, the defendant objected to her being sworn and examined because of her tender years, whereupon she was examined by tlie judge respecting her qualifications as a witness; and upon this examination, the child, being much frightened and scarcely able to…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. State v. WildmanOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Commonwealth v. ReaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. State v. DoyleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API