Johnson v. New Britain General Hospital
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the plaintiffs challenge for cause of a juror who allegedly had expressed actual bias, prejudice and partiality in his voir dire testimony.
In January, 1986, the plaintiff, Carl E. Johnson, individually and in his capacity as administrator of his wife’s estate, brought this action for medical malpractice against the following defendants: New Britain General Hospital; Dr. David Mucci, a resident intern; Dr. George H. Bray; and the New Britain Surgical Group, Inc., Bray’s professional corporation. The plaintiff’s amended…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Rease v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Eisenbach v. DowneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Morgan v. St. Francis Hospital & Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.