Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Grable v. Roderick

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original application for mandamus. Comp. Stat, Sec. 169, Ch. 77. Desty Taxation, 521. High Ex. Leg. Rem., Sec. 35. State v. Fyler, 48 Conn,, 145. Commissioners v. Cavanaugh, 19 N. W. R., 413. 43 N. J. Law,-389. 40 Cal., 280. 44 Iowa, 4$8.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel the defendant to pay to the relator certain money in his hands alleged to be due the city of Beatrice. The relator alleges in his petition that he is now, and has been for more than two years last past, the duly elected,- qualified, and acting treasurer of the city of Beatrice, in Gage county, which is a city of the second class having more than 5,000 inhabitants, and organized and existing as a corporation under -and by virtue of the laws of this state; and that the defendant, E. J. Roderick, is the duly elected, qualified, and acting treasurer of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. LeidtkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  2. State ex rel. Moore v. GandyNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  3. State ex rel. Clark v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Elkhorn v. HaneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. City of Cut Bank v. McNamerMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Douglas Cty. Sch. Dist. No. 66 v. EwingNebraska Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Calhoun v. Maricopa County Municipal Water ConservaTion District No. 1Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State ex rel. School District No. 11 v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API