Thew v. Porcelain Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before CARPENTER, J., at Edgefield, March Term, 1873. This was a special proceeding, commenced by rule lo show cause, to obtain an order setting aside a judgment for irregularity. The facts were these: The Southern Porcelain Manufacturing Company is a corporation, under a charter from this State, granted in the year 1856. In 1868 it carried on business in the County of Edgefield, at aplace which was afterwards included within the limits of the new County of Aiken.
Read the full summary
Before CARPENTER, J., at Edgefield, March Term, 1873. This was a special proceeding, commenced by rule lo show cause, to obtain an order setting aside a judgment for irregularity. The facts were these: The Southern Porcelain Manufacturing Company is a corporation, under a charter from this State, granted in the year 1856. In 1868 it carried on business in the County of Edgefield, at aplace which was afterwards included within the limits of the new County of Aiken. R. B. Bullock was then, and for several years previous had been, the President of the corporation, and G. Schaub, its General…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Wright, A. J.
By the understanding of the counsel on the hearing of the case in this Court, its consideration is not to be limited to the grounds of appeal from the order of His Honor Judge Maher, of January 5th, and that of His Honor Judge Carpenter, of March 10th, 1874.
The discussion embraced all the points not only made by the pleadings and the evidence in the case of the Southern Porcelain Manufacturing Company and Thew, Cashier of National Bank of Augusta, but involved the grounds on which Judge Maher, by his decree of 5th August, 1873, sustained…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fulton Bank v. New-York & Sharon Canal Co.New York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Schimmelpennich v. BayardSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
3Cited by1 opinion
- Duke v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905