Legal Opinion

Close v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 23, 1943No. C. D. 784PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

This case arising at the port of Seattle involves the-collector’s assessment of duty upon a printing press and equipment, imported from Canada, at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The importer claims that the merchandise is a manufacture of the United States and was exported by and returned to the same firm and therefore is entitled to-free entry as American goods returned under the provisions of paragraph 1615 of the act.

The facts adduced‘at the trial disclose that the Goss Printing Press Co. of Chicago, the party in interest in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Coastwise Steamship & Barge Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  2. Stone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. Goldkamp v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Nanco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Oil Well Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  5. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API