Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Van Der Veen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 18, 1997No. 77,071PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

This is an appeal from the decision of the district court denying one-half of the estate of Morris and Deanne Van Der Veen to their biological grandchild, D.B.B. Decedents’ son, Kent Van Der Veen, was disqualified under K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 59-513 (slayer statute) from inheriting any portion of their estate. The case was transferred from the Court of Appeals to this court pursuant to K.S.A. 20-3018(c).

The facts are not in dispute. The matter was decided by the district court on the following stipulated facts: The decedents, Morris and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Todd v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Hughes v. Inland Container Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. Galindo v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Lightner v. Centennial Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Dreyer v. SchrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reynolds-Rexwinkle Oil, Inc. v. Petex, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. Hulett v. First National Bank & Trust Co. in ClintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Hulett v. First National Bank & Trust Co. in ClintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. In re the Adoption of Infant ShermanSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API