Legal Opinion
State v. Peirson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 30, 1964No. File No. MV 10-14712PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.
The defendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle while his operator’s license was under suspension in violation of § 14-215 of the General Statutes, and with being a second offender. Upon a trial to the jury on the former charge, he was found guilty and, upon the denial of his motion *661to set aside the verdict, he pleaded guilty to the charge in the second part of the information that he was a second offender. His appeal is based on the court’s denial of his motion to set aside the jury’s verdict. The specific error assigned by the defendant is the court’s action “in denying the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peck v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Stavola v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Laufer v. Bridgeport Traction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SwitchenkoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
- State v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. TownsendConnecticut Appellate Court · 1972
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Ramos GarcíaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1965
- People v. Ramos GarcíaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.