Covington v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent
Eldridge, J,
dissenting:
In my view, the record in this case clearly shows that there was a denial of Covington’s constitutional right to have closing argument made before the rendition of a verdict. The record also shows that there was no waiver of that right. In fact, there was no opportunity for counsel to have waived Covington’s right to have closing argument. Consequently, I would not relegate the matter to a hearing under the Post Conviction Procedure Act. Instead, I would reverse.
Although the majority, as well as the parties, refer to this case as having been tried on an “agreed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.