Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hysjulien v. Hill Top Home of Comfort, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2013No. 20120163Published

1DissentSandstrom, Justice

[¶ 50] I respectfully dissent.

[¶ 51] Hysjulien’s later affidavit appears to be the classic sham affidavit.

[¶ 52] Hysjulien unequivocally told the North Dakota Department of Labor that *551she had been terminated on September 2, 2008.

[¶ 53] Hysjulien later filed an affidavit contradicting her earlier statement, saying she did not understand the legal significance of her previous statement in that it terminated her right to pursue her claim, and so she was providing a new version of what had happened. This appears to be the essence of a sham affidavit.

[¶ 54] It is important to note, it was not only…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API