Legal Opinion
Johann Breyer v. Doris Meissner, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 6, 2000No. 98-1842PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge.
This case involves the interpretation of our immigration laws as they apply to Johann Breyer, a naturalized citizen who claimed, when faced with denaturalization, that he had been entitled to American citizenship by birth through his American-born mother. The statutes governing Breyer’s claim to citizenship are § 1993 of the Revised Statutes of 1874 and a 1994 amendment to the Immigration and Naturalization Act (“INA”), § 101(c)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act (“INTCA”). In our review, we consider whether these provisions…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- International Refugee Assistance Project v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Salomon Ledezma-Cosino v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Flores-Nova v. Attorney General of the United States.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Frederick A. Lake v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Morales-Santana v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.