Legal Opinion
Potruch & Daab, LLC v. Abraham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 2012Published
1Opinion of the Court
*647The appeal from the order dated January 26, 2011, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion to dismiss the counterclaims to recover damages for, among other things, legal malpractice. The failure of a party to disclose a cause of action as an asset in a prior bankruptcy…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Kunica v. St. Jean Financial, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Whelan v. LongoNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Pryor & Mandelup, LLP v. SabbethAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.