In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 2-B
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
In this second phase of Florida’s decennial legislative apportionment process, the Court’s constitutional obligation is to determine the validity of the apportionment plan set forth in Senate Joint Resolution 2-B (SJR 2-B). In that joint resolution, the Legislature adopted a revised plan apportioning Florida’s Senate districts after this Court declared the original Senate *877apportionment plan to be constitutionally invalid. See In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176 (In re Apportionment Law — March 2012), 83 So.3d 597 (Fla.2012).
The declaratory judgment this Court…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Florida Dept. of Transp. v. JulianoSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- McGregor v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Youngblood v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176Supreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re Standards for Establishing Legislative District BoundariesSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- League of Women Voters v. Florida House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Florida House of Representatives v. League of Women Voters of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Florida House of Representatives v. RomoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- League of Women Voters of Florida v. DetznerSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute, Inc. v. Secretary, Florida Department of StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.