Legal Opinion

Brown v. Home Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 7, 1910No. 16,511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Franklin district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action to recover on a preliminary'parol contract of insurance. In 1904 the Home Insurance Company of New York issued a policy *443of insurance on a barn and other property belonging to Orpha Brown. In August, 1907, the insured, thinking that her policy was about to expire, applied to F. E. Fiehler, the agent of the company at Wellsville, for a renewal.of the contract of insurance, and although the former contract did not expire for about four months the agent agreed to renew the insurance on the same conditions and for the same…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Preferred Accident Insurance v. StoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Alliance Cooperative Insurance v. CorbettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. King v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  4. Baldwin v. Phoenix InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Bales v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Smith v. Miami Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Baker v. North River InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Cloyd v. Republic Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API