Weekley v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
One issue is presented on this appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company on stipulated facts: Whether Mr. Weekley can recover under his uninsured motorist policies for the loss of consortium after his wife has been paid the full amount provided by such policies for bodily injury to one person, thus exhausting the amount recoverable for one injury, but not the amount recoverable for one accident.
Identical uninsured motorist provisions in two insurance policies provide coverage for "bodily injury" to the insureds, Mr. and Mrs. Weekley.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Izzo v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Mattison v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Williams v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Price v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Malone v. Costa, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ex Parte DyessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Gonzales v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Valliere v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Littlefield v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Allstate Insurance v. PogorilichSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.