Legal Opinion

Saffan v. Saffan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 1991No. 91-1673PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants, Aaron Saffan and Benjamin Saffan, appeal a non-final order denying their motion to quash service for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm.

Appellants are beneficiaries under an inter-vivos trust, and appellant Aaron Saffan is the named trustee of the trust settled by their mother (Grantor). Appellees, Sol Saf-fan and Leon Saffan, also children of the grantor, were originally trust beneficiaries but were excluded by subsequent amendments to the trust.

Appellees brought an action contesting the validity of the trust. Appellants moved to quash service for lack of jurisdiction. The trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Henderson v. UsherSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lampe v. HoyneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Chereskin v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Grunert v. MachoverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. In Re: Estate of Ann Nancy LucianiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API