Legal Opinion
State of Hawaii v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided October 30, 2006No. CV. 06-00437 DAE-BMKPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT DEY, INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF REMOVAL
BARRY M. KURREN, United States Magistrate Judge.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT DEY, INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF REMOVAL
Defendant Dey, Inc. (“Dey”) seeks leave to file a supplemental notice of removal in order to add a new substantive basis for removal, namely, that the federal government’s service upon Dey of a recently unsealed qui tarn complaint pursuant to the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729-32 (2000) (FCA) made this case removable under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Arco Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department Of Health And Environmental Quality Of The State Of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Ahearn v. Charter Township of BloomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Green v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Haber v. MasseyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Frederick v. Service Experts Heating & Air Conditioning LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015
- Wisconsin v. Amgen, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007
- USA ex rel MohajerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021