Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

James M. Anderson v. John Bailey, Chairperson, Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 2, 2026No. 6:25-cv-00301Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON JAMES M. ANDERSON, Case No. 6:25-cv-00301-MC Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. JOHN BAILEY, Chairperson, Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Defendant. ________________________________ MCSHANE, Chief Judge. Plaintiff brings this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

alleging that his rights against the application of ex post facto laws were violated when the Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the Board) imposed conditions of parole rather than post- prison supervision (PPS) after his release from incarceration.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API