Legal Opinion

Bristol City Fire Department v. Maine

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 13, 2001No. 1537004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge.

Bristol City Fire Department (“employer”) contends the Workers’ Compensation Commission (“commission”) erred in awarding temporary total and medical benefits to Roy Carroll Maine (“claimant”). On appeal, employer argues that it rebutted the presumption afforded by Code § 65.2-402 and that claimant failed to present evidence sufficient to prove that his heart disease arose out of and in the course of his employment. For the following reasons, we affirm the commission’s decision to award benefits to claimant.

I. BACKGROUND

“On appeal, we view the evidence in the light…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wagner Enterprises, Inc. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  2. MANASSAS ICE AND FUEL CO. v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  3. Bass v. City of Richmond Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  4. Allen & Rocks, Inc. v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  5. Augusta County Sheriff's Department v. OverbeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. County of Henrico Police v. James Isaac Medlin, Jr.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
  2. Henrico County Division of Fire v. Estate of WoodyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
  3. John B. Patton, Jr. v. Loudoun Co.Bd.of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
  4. John B. Patton, Jr. v. Loudoun Co.Bd.of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API