Sena v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of New Mexico. In Error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of New Mexico.
1Opinion of the Court
PHILIPS, District Judge.
The appellant and plaintiff in error (hereinafter for convenience designated as “the defendant”) was indicted in the first judicial district court of the territory of New Mexico, in four counts, charged with having forged or caused to be forged and presented a certain receipt and a certificate purporting to have been given by one Arthur J. Tinker to Pedro Sanches, supervisor of -census, for services as interpreter. He was convicted and sentenced, under the provisions of section 5421, Revised Statutes of the United States [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3667], on each count,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Railroad Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Norris v. CrockerSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Insurance Co. v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Hornthall v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- US West Communications, Inc. v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- People's Sec. Bank v. SandersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- United States v. SenaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1909