Legal Opinion

Storey v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 1, 1954No. 5-534PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grifein Smith, Chief Justice.

The petition for prohibition — under an allegation that the court is without jurisdiction of the person against or in favor of whom a judgment might he rendered in that person’s official capacity — presents a single question: Where summons is directed to personal representative, but not placed in the hands of the sheriff or any other officer before a personal representative is appointed, does service on an administrator who is subsequently designated, and whose name does not appear in the summons, invest the trial court with jurisdiction in a local action for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ohio Millers Mutual Insurance v. Inter-Insurance Exchange of the Illinois Automobile ClubIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Goodkind v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Barker v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Goodyear Tire Rubber Company v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Matthews v. WarfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berryhill v. SynatzskeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Jenkins v. MeansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Berryhill v. SynatzskeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Berryhill v. SynatzskeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Berryhill v. SynatzskeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API