Legal Opinion

Lovejoy v. Lamar

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 19, 1917No. 8313PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Attachment; from Pulaski superior court—Judge Graham. June 13, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. Viewing most favorably for the plaintiff the evidence in the case, with all reasonable inferences and deductions arising therefrom, we think it is possible to hold that the evidence was sufficient to authorize the finding of the auditor, and of the jury sustaining his finding, that “At the time the $3,000 aforesaid came into the hands of T. E. Lovejoy on July 11, 1901, he then and there knew that it was the wish and desire of his principal, Mrs. Cornelia Lamar, that the said sum should be then and there paid over to one T. H. Grace in full satisfaction and pay*500ment of the note then held by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. BrightwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Weldon v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Gordon & Co. v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benton v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Lovejoy v. LamarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API