Legal Opinion

In re Heffron

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1913PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Habeas Corpus — Original Proceeding. Statement. — This is an original proceeding instituted in this court through suing out a writ of habeas corpus. There are three of the petitioners who' invoke the writ, viz., William H. Heffron, George Ringler and Oscar Close.

Read the full summary

Habeas Corpus — Original Proceeding. Statement. — This is an original proceeding instituted in this court through suing out a writ of habeas corpus. There are three of the petitioners who' invoke the writ, viz., William H. Heffron, George Ringler and Oscar Close. Though it does not fully appear,, it is to be inferred that these petitioners, with a number of others, were defendants in an injunction suit instituted by the St. Louis Catering Company against Hubert C. Wade and others in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis with, a view of restraining them from levying and pursuing a boycott…

1Opinion of the CourtNortoni, J.

(after stating the facts). — There can he no doubt that a number of persons, confederated together in combination, as through a conspiracy, may he restrained by a court of equity from interfering with the business of another so as to entail a substantial injury upon him, as by persuading his patrons, against their will, or by means of violence or threats *649preventing them from having beneficial business intercourse with the person against which the unlawful conspiracy is directed. [See Lohse Patent Door Co. v. Fuelle, 215 Mo. 421, 114 S. W. 997; Clarkson v. Laiblan, 178 Mo. App. 708, 161 S. W.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Iron Molders' Union No. 125 of Milwaukee v. Allischalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
  3. Karges Furniture Co. v. Amalgamated Woodworkers Local Union No. 131Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Rude v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  5. Ex parte CreasySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Paramount Enterprises, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Tri-City Central Trades Council v. American Steel FoundriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
  3. Mary G v. SouderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. State Ex Rel. Tannenbaum v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. In Re RandolphMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API