Legal Opinion

Pagano v. Rand Materials Handling Equipment Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1993No. 1-92-1803PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman

Plaintiff, Paul T. Pagano, appeals from two orders which were subsequently made appealable under Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (134 Ill. 2d R. 304(a)). The first order, entered June 22, 1990, imposed sanctions against plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to section 2— 611 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2 — 611). The second order, entered July 19, 1991, amended the previous one nunc pro tunc and identified plaintiff’s attorney by the firm’s name. Plaintiff raises three arguments on appeal: (1) the trial court improperly amended its June 22, 1990, order nunc pro tunc;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Beck v. SteppIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kenney v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Kellerman v. CroweIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BreslowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Thomas v. SklodowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Ad-Ex, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Harreld v. ButlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  5. Harreld v. ButlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API