Legal Opinion

Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Wirth

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1927No. 839PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF COURT

The following is taken verbatim from the opinion.

2Per curiam

Under our code of civil procedure, a motion for a new trial is not required to be filed under the circumstances disclosed in this case.

“2. No motion for a new trial is necessary to authorize a reviewing court to review the judgment of the trial court upon a motion to dissolve an attachment, although the weight of evidence is involved.” Stone, Assignee v. Bank, 8 C.C. 636.

_ The same conclusion was announced by a circuit court of another district, the opinion being found in 2 C.C. (N.S.) 554.

We are, therefore, unanimously, of- the…

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Laub v. Warren Guarantee Title Mortgage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API