Legal Opinion · Dissent

Meadows v. Peoples Life Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1937No. 8483Published

1DissentHatcher, Judge

The insured paid nothing for the policy and the insurer received nothing for it. The policy required the premium to be paid in advance, and denied the agent authority to waive the payment. It therefore seems to me that the contract of insurance was never completed.

The defense is based chiefly upon the following policy provisions: “* * * the weekly premium * * * shall at all times be paid in advance. * * * The terms of this policy cannot be changed or its conditions varied, except by a written agreement, signed by the President or Secretary of the Company. Therefore Agents (which term includes…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Wood v. . American Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. John R. Davis Lumber Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Medley v. German Alliance InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API