Legal Opinion

Mills v. Hyman (In Re Hyman)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina

Decided January 8, 1998No. 19-01264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOHN E. WAITES, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court for trial upon the complaint of Jack B. Mills, John R. Parker and Parker Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., (collectively the “Plaintiffs” and individually “Mr. Mills”, “Mr. Parker” and “Parker Lincoln-Mercury”) seeking an order declaring the indebtedness owed by William Clarke Hyman (“Mr. Hyman” or the “Debt- or”) to the Plaintiffs is non-dischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). 1

After receiving the testimony, considering all the evidence and weighing the credibility of the witnesses, the Court makes the following…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Palmacci v. UmpierrezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. In the Matter of Michael VAN HORNE. Margaret CASPERS, Appellee, v. Michael VAN HORNE, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tompkins & McMaster v. Whitenack (In Re Whitenack)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1998
  2. Discover Bank v. Warren (In re Warren)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API