Legal Opinion

Fox v. Hatch

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 15, 1842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Ejectment to recover the seizin and possession of certain lands. Plea, not guilty, and trial by the court. On the trial in the county court, the plaintiff showed that she was the legal owner of the premises in question, at the time of her marriage to one Conroy Fox, oii.«tS% 8th day of November, 1830, and that the defendant was in possession thereof at the commencement of this suit; that, at the March term of the supreme court in Orange county, A. D. 1837, a bill of divorce…

Read the full summary

Ejectment to recover the seizin and possession of certain lands. Plea, not guilty, and trial by the court. On the trial in the county court, the plaintiff showed that she was the legal owner of the premises in question, at the time of her marriage to one Conroy Fox, oii.«tS% 8th day of November, 1830, and that the defendant was in possession thereof at the commencement of this suit; that, at the March term of the supreme court in Orange county, A. D. 1837, a bill of divorce was granted her by said court, dissolving the bonds of matrimony between her and the said Conroy for the intolerable…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Royce, J.

The question to be determined is whether the *346real estate of a feme covert can legally be extended and set off on execution, in satisfaction of her debts contracted before marriage. It is contended that her legal disabilities are such, that the statute, authorizing the levy of executions upon land, cannot consistently or justly be carried into effect against her. It is urged that she is necessarily deprived of all means of paying the execution, and thereby preventing a levy upon her land ; that she has not authority to agree upon or choose…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laughter v. SeelaTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Gill v. StateWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Moore v. RichardsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1854
  4. Chatterton v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1877
  5. Burdick v. BurdickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API