Legal Opinion

Louisiana Afl-Cio v. Lanier Business Products, Inc., Third Party v. Martin Bennett, Third Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 27, 1986No. 85-3646PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT MADDEN HILL, Circuit Judge:

In this Louisiana diversity case we are presented with the question whether a plaintiff in a redhibitory action may obtain a reduction in price for the inconvenience caused by the product and for the overall poor performance of the product. We answer the question in the affirmative. We further hold that the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, that the district court acted within its discretion in determining the amount of the reduction, and that an unincorporated association may obtain a reduction in price for inconvenience and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. David R. Green v. Amerada-Hess CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Menville v. Stephens Chevrolet, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clois Osburn and Anita Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., Rachelle Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,737 Browning Seed, Inc. v. Johnnie BaylesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Family Drug Store v. GULF STATES COMPUTER SERVICESLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API