Legal Opinion

Muniz v. Rosales

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 26, 1972No. 15053PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADENA, Justice.

Appellee, Victor Rosales, who will be referred to as plaintiff, filed this suit to set aside part of a final decree of partition or Porcion 77, Mier Jurisdiction, Starr County, rendered on October 11, 1966, in Cause No. 2373, alleging that he was not served with process in the partition suit and that he had acquired title by limitations to 41.06 acres of land located within Porcion 77. The only parties named as defendants in the litigation now before us are the appellants, Leopoldo Muniz, Jr., and A. J. Vale, to whom such 41.06 acres were awarded by the judgment in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sanders v. HarderTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Harrison v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StormCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Pierce-Fordyce Oil Ass'n v. StaleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diana Gruensteiner v. Cotulla Independent School District, City of Cotulla, Texas and La Salle County, Texas Luis Ayala, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
  2. Diana Gruensteiner v. Cotulla Independent School District, City of Cotulla, Texas and La Salle County, Texas Luis Ayala, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API