Legal Opinion

State v. Weind

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1977No. 76-1128PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IA.

2Per curiam

Appellant’s first five propositions of law attack the constitutionality of Ohio’s death penalty statutes.

In his first proposition of.law, appellant contends that the Ohio statutory scheme places unconstitutional limitations upon the consideration of mitigating circumstances, since the character and history .of the defendant do. no.t constitute separate mitigating circumstances, bnt are considered only in terms of establishing duress, coercion, strong provocation, psychosis, or mental deficiency, all of which focus the trial judge’s attention on the defendant’s condition or state of mind at…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. WilesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. BuellOhio Supreme Court · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API