Aetna Insurance Co. v. Snider

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The primary issue to be resolved on this appeal is whether Charles Snider, who had procured a fire insurance policy on certain property which was subsequently destroyed by fire, had the requisite insurable interest in the destroyed property. The trial court answered in the affirmative and entered judgment accordingly. However, the insurance company which issued the policy is claiming that the trial court based its finding and conclusion on insufficient, incompetent and prejudicial evidence.

This action was instituted by the appel-lee, Charles Snider, to recover $3500.00…