Golinski v. Odin Stove Manufacturing Co.

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This appeal by claimant in a workmen’s compensation case has no merit on the facts, and is procedurally defective to raise the question of the alleged inconsistency of the findings of fact of the compensation authorities.

Claimant sought compensation under the provisions of the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 566, No. 284, 77 PS § 1201 et seq. He alleged that he was totally disabled on February 24, 1942, as a result of silicosis, and that he was last exposed to such hazard while in defendant’s employ. Defendant and its insurance carrier in…