Legal Opinion · Dissent

The Florida Bar v. Jacqueline Marie Kinsella

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 20, 2018No. SC17-55Published

1DissentPariente, J.

I begin with the acknowledgment that the conduct of Ms. Kinsella, freshly out of law school and having passed the Florida Bar Exam, cannot be excused when she stole $140, $100, and $520 from Kohl's Department store where she was working over a two-week period. But, as Kinsella does not attempt to justify her actions, has shown extreme remorse, and never contested the charges filed by The Florida Bar, the only question in this case is the appropriate sanction: Should Kinsella be given a ten-day suspension, as recommended by the referee who observed Ms. Kinsella, a ninety-one day suspension as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. LawlessSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. The Florida Bar v. Del PinoSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  3. The Florida Bar v. De La TorreSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. Florida Bar v. ArciaSupreme Court of Florida · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API