Legal Opinion

Throgmorton v. Mosak

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mb, Justice Barry

delivered the opinion of the court.

In a mechanic’s lien proceeding brought by the original contractor, appellant filed an answer and cross-bill claiming a lien as a subcontractor. Upon a hearing the court dismissed the bill and cross-bill for want of equity.

By section 21 of the Liens Act, Cahill’s St. ch. 82, If 21, a subcontractor is given a lien but under section 28, Cahill’s St. ch. 82, f[ 28, it cannot be enforced until ten days after his notice has been served as provided in certain other sections, including section 24, Cahill’s St. ch. 82, if 24. Appellant contends that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haj v. American Bottle Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Carney v. TullyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. McNemar v. CohnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  4. Wilson v. LowmasterIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Eastwood v. Road District No. 5Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matthews Roofing Co. v. Community Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Schwaller Lumber Co., Inc. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Capital Plumbing & Heating Co. v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  4. Agles v. Stolze Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API